News Alert
UPDATE: Massive Berkeley Brush Fire Contained As…

Locally, Sequestration Could Hit Special Needs Programs Hardest

Local school officials keeping an eye on developments.

The Hillsborough school district faces the deadline to submit the 2013-14 budget to the county next week with uncertainty as to whether $85 billion in federal "sequestration" spending cuts will be stopped by Congress before Friday. 

And while districts will learn their state aid figures this week after Gov. Chris Christie delivers his fiscal year 2014 budget address Tuesday afternoon, the Friday deadline for avoiding some impacts of sequestration is also weighing on budget plans.

"Obviously, we can use every penny from the federal government we can get, so it is on the radar," Hillsborough Business Administrator Aiman Mahmoud said Monday.

He noted the district doesn't receive a lot of federal aid—about $1.8 million in the district's $130 million budget—but what aid it does receive is specifically for mandated programs, such as special education.

"We're mandated to provide those services to those children, so we would have to find a way to do it within the budget," he said.

The district received $1.4 million in IDEA grant funding from the federal government in the 2012-13 budget, which supports the district's special education programs. 

The district also received an additional $320,540 in various grants, mostly aimed at subsidizing programs for low-income families.

Both fund sources could be impacted by the sequestration, if Congress does not act before Friday. 

Township officials have less on the line, at least directly, and Township Administrator Anthony Ferrera said the township does not expect to face much impact from any sequestration of funds.

"The only thing that could potentially be impacted would be the FEMA grants for the hurricane," he said, adding the township does not receive any federal funding directly.

Programs which are federally funded but flow through the state could be impacted, but Ferrera said officials have not indicated any concerns about the programs in recent meetings. 

At the county level, Freeholder Director Peter Palmer said he thinks it's meaningless to estimate the impact at this point, adding he thinks something will be done "between now and Friday."

"I am sure it would affect us, but I have no idea how much," Palmer said Monday.

Palmer added that he believes something must be done to address federal spending, but he wouldn't be surprised if the issue is pushed off into the future again.

Palmer, a Republican, also said he believes the Obama administration is aiming the cuts at areas that would hurt the most people, so as to create the most public opposition to proposed spending reductions.

"That's the way the game is played," he said.

Rep. Leonard Lance, R-7, said Monday that he would support the across-the-board cuts taking effect on Friday as planned.

"I am among those who support a more laser-like approach toward reducing spending and our national debt that exceeds $16 trillion," he said.

"Republican voted twice, in May and December of last year, to replace the current sequester with smarter, more targeted cuts," he added. "Yet the President opposed those efforts and for his part has failed to put forth serious, credible alternative. I certainly believe the president needs to show more leadership on this issue."

Without action from Congress, the sequester would go into effect automatically on March 1, reducing spending by the state in a number of areas, including education, the environment, health, military and law enforcement, the White House said.

The cuts, according to the Obama administration, could jeopardize 160 teacher and aide jobs in New Jersey, as well as cut funding to 60 schools and 15,000 students.

Funding would be cut to the early childhood education program Head Start, vaccination programs for children and health services for seniors, among other things, and thousands of civilian Department of Defense employees could be furloughed, according to the White House.

The total federal spending cuts under the sequester add up to about $1.2 trillion over the next nine years.

Republicans have accused the president of using the impending cuts for political gain.

Obama's plan asks for increased tax revenues to offset some of the trillion-dollar cuts.

Interested Party February 25, 2013 at 11:00 PM
The statement by Freeholder Palmer is factually inaccurate. The cuts were agreed upon by both houses of Congress and signed into law by the President. They were purposely designed to be across-the-board cuts in defense and discretionary spending so that all would be hurt by the cuts. President Obama does not, in this case, have the authority to aim the cuts at areas that would hurt the most people as Freeholder Palmer suggested. I'm also a bit concerned that one of our elected County officials has not taken the time to understand what effect the sequester will have on County finances.
tr February 26, 2013 at 03:30 AM
One school district per county, one superintendent per county, one board of education per county, one NJEA contract negotiated at the state level, one set of rotten rules applied equally per county, one sports team per sport per county(wow that one really got your attention, did't it), one student transportation system per county, etc,etc. Anything more is private education paid for by people who can afford it. If you can't afford it, do not expect the government to pay for it because of some imaginary social deficieny that is designed to emit public sympathy, rather, work harder and get a better job and a higher degree of self esteem.
Richard Lesnik February 26, 2013 at 12:52 PM
Freeholder Palmer can't blame the President for everything. If the selfish fools in Congress understood the word "compromise" none of this would be happening. By the way, look up the word "sequester" and explain how it means what the politicians are using it for.
Stirlingt February 26, 2013 at 01:58 PM
Any "cuts"(they are actually cuts to the proposed increases) can be spread throughout the year. There is no reason to make the entire "cut" to spending take effect on March 1st.
PatchFan February 26, 2013 at 04:46 PM
Let's remember who's idea it was. It's now time for the President to lead us out of this mess. Here's a link to the Washington Post calling out the President: http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/02/26/obama-sequester-leadership-washington-post/#
PatchFan February 26, 2013 at 04:47 PM
Why stop there? Since we're only going to have one sports team, how about one marching band, one debated club, etc... Heck, how about one high school per county?
PatchFan February 26, 2013 at 04:50 PM
Exactly, they're cuts to increases... this chicken little - the sky is going to fall campaign by the President is pathetic.
PatchFan February 26, 2013 at 04:52 PM
Even if Congress can come up with a compromise, it won't necessarily past muster with this "My Way" President.
Fred Garvin February 26, 2013 at 09:46 PM
Compromise means that congress must cave to the president's demands. He will never compromise as he is on a path to bankrupting this country.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something